Cantr II Discussion Forum

To an extent, you dumbass! LMAO

That's libertarianism, not anarchy. There's quite an extent of difference between the two. If there were anarchy, I would not be such an insignificant bum. I would be stronger, seeing as I would spend no more time in front of a computer (computer companies would not be able to maintain their own existences) And instead, I would play with my necklace of human teeth.

Nope.
That's not anarchy.
Anarchy is more like "Oni hurts Sammy with a pickaxe" then "several people hurt Oni". You see this reaction all over Cantr and in some places there is laws against it. Some hits someone else for "no reason" or whatever and several people hit the hitter.

*David snipes Oni from 200 yards while Oni is pumping for gas*
(that was in a representative democracy by the way)

I now got all my friends, parents, and teachers to take the test as well!

At first I misread the diagram showing where all the world l;eaders are and I thought I was near Jacques Chirac. I allmost died right there and then. Luckily I'm not near that monster!

David Goodwin wrote:Nope.
That's not anarchy.
Anarchy is more like "Oni hurts Sammy with a pickaxe" then "several people hurt Oni". You see this reaction all over Cantr and in some places there is laws against it. Some hits someone else for "no reason" or whatever and several people hit the hitter.

*David snipes Oni from 200 yards while Oni is pumping for gas*
(that was in a representative democracy by the way)

Actually, in anarchy, there'd be the "several people *try* to hurt Oni." I'd just eviscerate them 'cause I'm so badass. *strikes a pose*

OniKaze wrote:

David Goodwin wrote:Nope.
That's not anarchy.
Anarchy is more like "Oni hurts Sammy with a pickaxe" then "several people hurt Oni". You see this reaction all over Cantr and in some places there is laws against it. Some hits someone else for "no reason" or whatever and several people hit the hitter.

*David snipes Oni from 200 yards while Oni is pumping for gas*
(that was in a representative democracy by the way)

Actually, in anarchy, there'd be the "several people *try* to hurt Oni." I'd just eviscerate them 'cause I'm so badass. *strikes a pose*

Their is two outcomes to anarchy.
1) The top agression-capable capable group or person choose to take over and establish a goverment.
2) The top agression-capable capable group or person choose to not take over and prevent anyone else from being agressive or taking over.

So the question is if Oni, being the biggest badass in the scenario, choose to let anarchy happen.

Of course Oni choosing to be king is a possible outcome however Oni must sleep. And being asleep is removed by another. The cycle repeats until a group with locks, guards, and support arises or all who want to take over are removed in their sleep.

Sleep? Sleep is for the weak! Haha!

Yeah, anarchy is pretty unstable and usually leads to small scale despotism. Despotism is probably the most basic and stable form of government.

edit: stable as a system, not necessarily for any specific regime

like in Kwor

don't get me started

haily blerks (formerly smith) is such a little biznatch...

take a look at the top of the "government of kwor" note....
when tinuviel first proposed a government with 3 or so people running it, Haily was the person who said "no we don't need one" and basically shot the whole thing down. tinuviel left, and lo and behold...her idea of 3 or so people running the town is replaced (in the same note) by haily blerks, haily blerks, and haily blerks. damn.

Sleep isn't for the weak, just sleep at night is.

I have my sleep schedule all screwed up--last night (or rather this morning) I went to bed at 7:30 a.m. and woke up at 4 this afternoon! LMAO

Fiji time zone
nice

http://www.boasas.com/?c=12

i love you, boasas....

LMAO That was funny!