Page 1 of 2

Typo Gremlins

Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 12:27 am
by Psycho Pixie
has anyone else been plagued by typo gremlins on the game lately????? I think maybe the typo gremlins birth rate has gone up. They are seasonal, but this season has been rather... surprising.


Psycho Pixie

Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 3:38 am
by Pirate Lass
Typo gremlins! Must kill them all! :evil:

Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 12:36 pm
by Revanael
Hmmm. has somebody been reading my sig?

Yeah, they do seem to be turning up more recently. Very dangerous.

Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 2:22 pm
by Mavsfan911
:lol:
I didnt even need to read this to know what it was about..... hehe.

Yes, they've been showing up alot recently.... and at all the wrong times.

Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:44 pm
by Ash
Typo gremlings occur only for the untrained fingers.

Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 7:34 pm
by Cheshierekat
Typo gremlins like to take advantage of my fast typing.

Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 9:24 pm
by 1959 Apache
Typo gremlins have invaded my home office. They sabotage an average of every ten words, latelt. I am no typist, and they are makinhg me look unintelligebt.

I won't do anyhting about them, since gremlins and I have a relationship[. I am hoping that they will tire of my house and move on,

I thionk I imported them when I went to Illinoius to but another old pickup truck (1966 GMC). The Vehicle ID# had a digit that didn't match the title. Obviously the work of highly advanced typo gremlins.

Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2004 5:43 am
by Psycho Pixie
wow... not everyone thinks i am crazy... thats a relief, really it is.


crazy, i was crazy once, they stuck me in a little rubber room with little rubber rats... oh gods, rats they make me crazy.. CRAZY? i was crazy once....


PsPi

Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2004 6:25 am
by rklenseth
Aren't we all insane? I mean how do we know that our perception of reality is the sane one? What if the people we call insane are actually the sane ones and we are the insane? Or is this majority reality meaning that the majority of perceptions that are right automatically are considered the sane rather than the insane?

So my belief is that we are all insane and that all reality and perception are just figments of our imagination. In fact, we ourselves are figments of our own imagination. We don't really exist. We just believe we exist and so becomes our reality and perception. So since we believe we exist we make other people believe we exist and so we become their reality and perception.

What if this is the whole lot of the 'verse? That everything is based upon the reality and perception thereof of each individual. We don't exist but yet we do. Or perhaps you only exist because someone believes you exist and so if they stop believing in your existence will you cease to exist or because that person believed you exist you became and thus became to believe in your own existence and created others that believed you existed by believing that they existed?

So the question is, where does sanity lay? Does it lay in reality and perception thereof?

By our own existence we are all perfectly sane but also perfectly insane. So where does that leave us?

Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2004 7:28 am
by Revanael
I think all of us here are insane, including me, but that isnt a bad thing. Insanity is much more interesting than sanity.

Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2004 8:33 am
by Lone Wolf
A new study has shown that between the average ages of 13-21 neural path ways are being formed between the left and right lobe to the frontal cortex of the brain. it was known that the human brain is 95% developed by the age of 5. This explains why teenagers will make a stupid decision. The lack of the neural pathways, prevents them from seeing the consequences of thier actions. It is these mistakes that form the neural pathways, so that they can see the the consequences of thier actions. thus making it true that we learn from our mistakes.
However, being unable to see the consequences of ones actions, makes that person legally insane. Therefore, one can say anyone under the age of 21 is legally insane.

I read this in a magazine, and if I can find it on the net I'll post the link here.

Back on topic. Can you read the above and find out if those damn typo gremlins are still after me? :wink:

Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2004 10:34 am
by Revanael
Lone Wolf wrote:A new study has shown that between the average ages of 13-21 neural path ways are being formed between the left and right lobe to the frontal cortex of the brain. it was known that the human brain is 95% developed by the age of 5. This explains why teenagers will make a stupid decision. The lack of the neural pathways, prevents them from seeing the consequences of thier actions. It is these mistakes that form the neural pathways, so that they can see the the consequences of thier actions. thus making it true that we learn from our mistakes.
However, being unable to see the consequences of ones actions, makes that person legally insane. Therefore, one can say anyone under the age of 21 is legally insane.

I read this in a magazine, and if I can find it on the net I'll post the link here.

Back on topic. Can you read the above and find out if those damn typo gremlins are still after me? :wink:


Just the one, I think.

Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2004 2:13 pm
by Mavsfan911
Serenity (rklenseth) wrote:Aren't we all insane? I mean how do we know that our perception of reality is the sane one? What if the people we call insane are actually the sane ones and we are the insane? Or is this majority reality meaning that the majority of perceptions that are right automatically are considered the sane rather than the insane?

So my belief is that we are all insane and that all reality and perception are just figments of our imagination. In fact, we ourselves are figments of our own imagination. We don't really exist. We just believe we exist and so becomes our reality and perception. So since we believe we exist we make other people believe we exist and so we become their reality and perception.

What if this is the whole lot of the 'verse? That everything is based upon the reality and perception thereof of each individual. We don't exist but yet we do. Or perhaps you only exist because someone believes you exist and so if they stop believing in your existence will you cease to exist or because that person believed you exist you became and thus became to believe in your own existence and created others that believed you existed by believing that they existed?

So the question is, where does sanity lay? Does it lay in reality and perception thereof?

By our own existence we are all perfectly sane but also perfectly insane. So where does that leave us?


To sum that up: We are all insane, and we over analyze our insanity.
What you just wrote has forced me to think, damnit.

Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2004 4:11 pm
by Psycho Pixie
Serenity (rklenseth) wrote:Aren't we all insane? I mean how do we know that our perception of reality is the sane one? What if the people we call insane are actually the sane ones and we are the insane? Or is this majority reality meaning that the majority of perceptions that are right automatically are considered the sane rather than the insane?

So my belief is that we are all insane and that all reality and perception are just figments of our imagination. In fact, we ourselves are figments of our own imagination. We don't really exist. We just believe we exist and so becomes our reality and perception. So since we believe we exist we make other people believe we exist and so we become their reality and perception.

What if this is the whole lot of the 'verse? That everything is based upon the reality and perception thereof of each individual. We don't exist but yet we do. Or perhaps you only exist because someone believes you exist and so if they stop believing in your existence will you cease to exist or because that person believed you exist you became and thus became to believe in your own existence and created others that believed you existed by believing that they existed?

So the question is, where does sanity lay? Does it lay in reality and perception thereof?

By our own existence we are all perfectly sane but also perfectly insane. So where does that leave us?




I say we take a vote... who here thinks that RKL thinks to much?

Psycho Pixie

Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2004 4:29 pm
by Revanael
I think that what the pixie thinks is right; RKL thinks too much. I think.

Please forgive me for that poor attempt at humour.