Cantr II Discussion Forum

Pentagon shamefully backed away from the very reasonable condemnation of the US law firms representing Guantanamo detainees. American lawyers undo the injustices inflicted by the American soldiers who fight and die in Afghanistan. Only a handful out of the thousands of detainees was rendered from Afghanistan to Guantanamo; they are not a random crowd. Many of them are not guilty beyond the basic affiliation with Taliban, but guilt of others could not be proven. What evidence of terrorist activity, acceptable in the court of law, could be found in Afghanistan? In the absence of documents or wiretaps, evidence is reduced to testimonies of dubious witnesses.

The image of selfless American attorneys - people of great moral integrity - engaged in pro bono defense of Afghan peasants is hilarious. In the pro bono affair, leftist lawyers sabotage the American war effort, and other attorneys shamelessly use it for self-promotion.

Right.... thanks for that... bizarre little bit of information there (Curiously enough this isn't spam, there's no link or anything). So why did you post this?

That's hardly a fair comparison. Sharks may kill people from time to time, but they don't go out looking specifically for people to kill. Lawyers, on the other hand, are natural predators of the human race.

Just delete this or at least change the headline. The first thing that comes up on Google is the blog this thing was first posted in. It's not fair. Newbies should be restricted from starting their own topics, there could be a sticky for help requests, introductions and such.

Perhaps this user could be blocked, as this is the third time that they have posted something like this, most likely for those reasons. I think they'll keep doing it until they're blocked, which just means a lot of deleting or title changing.

Yes I agree - I'm blocking the user - whilst the subjects are interesting and posted in the correct section it is still essentially a bot promoting a special interest group - a google search finds plenty of other more suitable (and unsuitable) forums this bot is posting on - If people are interested in seeing what it is posting then I direct them to Google.