David Goodwin wrote:rklenseth wrote:
Like I said, Turkey is made up of a lot of remote locations. And when you visited those remote locations did you ask the people what religion they practiced or did you just assume they were Muslim because they lived in Turkey?
Lack of churches. Lack of crosses. Lack of data. Yes an asumption. But I think your assupmton that the Turks are hiding 41% of thier population from the rest of the world belong in the conspiriacy topic.rklenseth wrote:And I wouldn't really call Turkey an Islamic Democracy anyways. They are very secular and even though most of the government is run by Muslims doesn't make it an Islamic Democracy. That is like calling France a Catholic Democracy or Great Britian an Anglican(sp?) Democracy. Now you could call Egypt an Islamic Democracy and be right about that.
Yes. West corrected me on that. That is not what I mean.
People are saying that the democracy in Iraq will be a first for
1) a democracy in the middle east - false
2) a democracy with a muslim majority - false
Egypt isn't a democracy is it?
I think people mean Culturally wise as far as Iraq and that portion of the world. Since Turkey is considered more Western it is not really added into the equation. Plus, countries like Saudi Arabia border Iraq while they don't Turkey.
Egypt is a democracy but a democracy run by Islamic clerics. They usually tell their people who to vote for and all that crap so techinically it is a democracy while it really isn't. They do elect a president and all that but the people are told who should be elected and those that people don't like usually end up being assassinated.