HAPPY CANDA DAY!!!!!!

Schme · Postby **Schme** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:15 pm

From what I've seen, you do not display your intellect at all, but rather just alot of bad spelling.

Pie · Postby **Pie** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:21 pm

well then let it be known that i do have an intelect of great proportion. not that great, but pretty good. oo, and i only reveil my intelect with privat mesaging(exept for that one mesage i mesaged to y self :wink:

).
_________________

pie will rule you all

you know you love me.

Schme · Postby **Schme** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:23 pm

Well, I am happy for you.

However, if you wish your repeated calls to be taken seriously to be taken seriously, then be serious.

Pie · Postby **Pie** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:26 pm

when i'me seriouse, i mean what i say. other words, ime being silly, funny, ore stupid. let us now count to ten and forget about this all.

_________________

pie will rule you all

you know you love me.

Schme · Postby **Schme** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:29 pm

You may not have noticed, but many people here do not at all appreciate your silliness, and find your attempts at humour, however funny they may seem to you, or whoever else, annoying.

Pie · Postby **Pie** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:32 pm

Pie wrote:. let us now count to ten and forget about this all.

_________________

pie will rule you all

you know you love me.

Talapus · Postby **Talapus** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:34 pm

Schme, I think you are perhaps a bit confused as to the phrase "layman's terms". A layman is someone who is not a professional, and as you may know, professionals tend to have a completely different vernacular (just listen to a conversation between two computer programmers, and you will understand what I am saying). So putting something in layman's terms would be to take something that can only be understood by professionals (in that specific field), and make it understandable by anyone (including professionals in another field). It does not imply that these "laymen" are less intelligent, but rather, that the terms used by the professionals would be unintelligible to them. Oh and Pie, it really hurts my eyes to read some of your posts. Would you please consider using a spell checker, or even just correcting some of the words that have been pointed out to you?

Pie · Postby **Pie** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:38 pm

i shall try, my fine sir.

hey, you know what? i saw this one paper, it was spelld horribly, with two t's in some places, and u were there should be o's, , and i read it realy fast, and i understood every letter of it.
________________

pie will rule you all.

you know you love me.

Nixit · Postby **Nixit** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:41 pm

So if we read your posts really fast we should be able to understand them?

Pie · Postby **Pie** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:46 pm

yes.
__________

pie will rule you all

you know you love me

Schme · Postby **Schme** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:48 pm

Nobody gives a damn, Pie.

Pie · Postby **Pie** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:54 pm

that was un needed.

ah well. in the words of leeroy(i think it was) at least i have chiken.
_________________

pie will ruley you all

you know you love me.

Schme · Postby **Schme** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:02 pm

On the contrary. It appears it was needed as you do not seem to understand that even though people are able to make out what you are writting, they are still annoyed by your intentional bad grammar.

Pie · Postby **Pie** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:06 pm

intintional would mean that i did it on perpouse. i don't have bad grammer on perpose. i have bad grammer becouse i can't remember what a word is, or i am writing really fast.
______________

pie will rule you all

you know you love me

kinvoya · Postby **kinvoya** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:44 pm

Schme, please, we've been over this with Pie. He does it deliberately to annoy and to get people's attention like he has gotten yours right now. Please ignore him.

HAPPY CANDA DAY!!!!!!

Who is online