The Industriallist wrote:Er, that seems like faulty science. I think the 'beer belly' has more to do with the significant caloric content.
But if live yeast concerns you, you could boil it first.
Drink boiled beer. Mmmm sounds tasty.


Moderators: Public Relations Department, Players Department
The Industriallist wrote:Er, that seems like faulty science. I think the 'beer belly' has more to do with the significant caloric content.
But if live yeast concerns you, you could boil it first.
Pirog wrote:Edit: Don't take this as me saying that people who doesn't drink or smoke are uninteresting. If you do you have missed my point
Myself, I know that if I wanted to drink, I wouldnt be responsable and quit when I should. thats why I dont drink. and thats the kind of people that shouldnt drink in my opinion.
cantrpotatoe wrote:why dont you jump off a very high bridge? dont you want to experience that?? thats what life is all about? right? experiences?![]()
some experiences are wrong for some people. like jumping off a bridge is as wrong for me as drinking is..
but if you see fun in doing something that can be very bad.. go ahead..
Pirog wrote:Haha...what a bunch of drama queens you are![]()
Jumping off bridges and blowing people's brains out can never be compared to drinking alcohol.
Many of you seems to really need the experience, since you seem to believe that there is a big chance of becoming an alcoholic just because you drink sometimes.
Pirog wrote:cantrpotatoe>
That drunk people shoot other people or jump off bridges doesn't have to mean that the alcohol is to blame.
It's like those idiots who think psychos like the ones in the Columbine massacre became like that because they watched violent movies...
Revanael wrote:Violent movies, games, etc exist because there are violent people. Not the other way round.
Anthony Roberts wrote:Look what I started, bloody 'effing hell.
I don't drink because I -don't want- that experience. It's not that I can't see that some people can drink responsibly, it's just that I don't know if I would, and I don't want to find out.
Let's place yourself in the role of a Police Officer, or something. You've got a gun pointed at some person. You have two choices, lower the gun and arrest them, or blow their brain away. Lowering the gun would be to not drink at all. Blowing their head away would be trying that new experience. After the cop shoots the guy in the head, he has consequences to face afterwards - but he doesn't know what they are until he gets back to his commanding officer. They could lead to councilling (Addition to Alcohal, go to AA meetings), being fired (Outcast by your friends for your chaotic actions while drunk), trialled for murder (Perhaps you killed someone while drunk? It's happened many times before.), or left alone and asked to write a report (You controlled your alcohal.).
Point being, out of all the pluses and negatives of drinking, the negatives FAR outweight the positives. I'd rather not find out how I'd react to drinking, and just pass that opportunity right on by.
Revanael wrote:Wooo, two out of three. Now, just the "Yes, dear" bit to practice...
Return to “Non-Cantr-Related Discussion”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest