The (relative) dangers of marijuana

General chitchat, advertisements for other services, and other non-Cantr-related topics

Moderators: Public Relations Department, Players Department

User avatar
Savanik
Posts: 207
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2005 5:53 am
Location: Missouri, USA

Postby Savanik » Mon Oct 24, 2005 3:05 am

Nick wrote:Check the "withdrawal" part of the graph, Sav.


I checked out that part. And the rest of the graph. The whole thing smells fishy to me.

Rated one to six? One to six what?

This looks like a 'study' based on a questionairre. 'On a rating of 1 to 6, how would you rate your withdrawal symptoms to tobacco? How intoxicating do you find cigarettes?'

Studies like that have a number of problems with them, starting with subjective responses and just going on from there.

Sav

EDIT: Anyone ever die from an overdose of nicotene from cigarettes? ;)
User avatar
formerly known as hf
Posts: 4120
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 2:58 pm
Location: UK

Postby formerly known as hf » Mon Oct 24, 2005 3:07 am

Nick wrote:I disagree. Compared to other "drugs",
Ok - what I meant was comapred to other comparable drugs - i.e: tobacco

of course it's safer than crack and smack...
Whoever you vote for.

The government wins.
User avatar
Nick
Posts: 3606
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 8:27 pm
Location: Halifax, Canada

Postby Nick » Mon Oct 24, 2005 3:10 am

Six being the highest, lower than that being lowest.

These were ranked by Dr Henningfield of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, and Dr Benowitz of the University of California at San Francisco.

Now of course, addiction cannot truly be measured quantitavely, but the results look reasonable to me.
User avatar
formerly known as hf
Posts: 4120
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 2:58 pm
Location: UK

Postby formerly known as hf » Mon Oct 24, 2005 3:11 am

Nick wrote:Now of course, addiction cannot truly be measured quantitavely
:)
Thankyou :D
Whoever you vote for.



The government wins.
User avatar
Nick
Posts: 3606
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 8:27 pm
Location: Halifax, Canada

Postby Nick » Mon Oct 24, 2005 3:12 am

hallucinatingfarmer wrote:
Nick wrote:I disagree. Compared to other "drugs",
Ok - what I meant was comapred to other comparable drugs - i.e: tobacco

of course it's safer than crack and smack...


Fair enough, it is hard to measure the cancer causing properties of marijuana.

But if everything that a study has shown to increase likelihood of cancer was made illegal... that would leave our grocery list much shorter, wouldn't it? :)
User avatar
formerly known as hf
Posts: 4120
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 2:58 pm
Location: UK

Postby formerly known as hf » Mon Oct 24, 2005 3:15 am

indeed - it would also require the disposal of the majority of our household items...

EDIT: topic split - the deviant discussion was taking up as much space as the original thread...
Whoever you vote for.



The government wins.
User avatar
Nick
Posts: 3606
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 8:27 pm
Location: Halifax, Canada

Postby Nick » Mon Oct 24, 2005 3:18 am

hallucinatingfarmer wrote:
Nick wrote:Now of course, addiction cannot truly be measured quantitavely
:)
Thankyou :D


But it is, as I said, based on the observations of people educated on the subject. It does fairly accurately depict what it is trying to depict.
User avatar
formerly known as hf
Posts: 4120
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 2:58 pm
Location: UK

Postby formerly known as hf » Mon Oct 24, 2005 3:22 am

as do the statistics that acuratly depict the dangers of marijuana - stats can depict what you'd like them to depict - but, personally, I would probably agree with the general jist of that graph
Whoever you vote for.



The government wins.
User avatar
Nick
Posts: 3606
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 8:27 pm
Location: Halifax, Canada

Postby Nick » Mon Oct 24, 2005 3:26 am

hallucinatingfarmer wrote:as do the statistics that acuratly depict the dangers of marijuana


You're no noobee debater. Let's see 'em!
Cookie
Posts: 756
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 11:51 am
Location: NE & NW England

Postby Cookie » Mon Oct 24, 2005 1:40 pm

I'd disagree with cocaine. That stuffs amazing and harmless, unless you get addicted. (only from my experience though)

And you can technicly overdose on Pot. I know a girl who almost choked on her own vomit and heard of another who actualy did. It's an absaloutely rubbish drug anyway in my opinion.
User avatar
Sunni Daez
Posts: 3645
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 1:33 pm
Location: ~A blissful state of mind~

Postby Sunni Daez » Mon Oct 24, 2005 4:48 pm

Cookie Monster wrote:I'd disagree with cocaine. That stuffs amazing and harmless, unless you get addicted. (only from my experience though)

And you can technicly overdose on Pot. I know a girl who almost choked on her own vomit and heard of another who actualy did. It's an absaloutely rubbish drug anyway in my opinion.


Not true...oh so not true...you need to read a bit more!!!
Image

Run...Dragon...Run!!!
User avatar
formerly known as hf
Posts: 4120
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 2:58 pm
Location: UK

Postby formerly known as hf » Mon Oct 24, 2005 5:52 pm

Cookie Monster wrote:I'd disagree with cocaine. That stuffs amazing and harmless, unless you get addicted. (only from my experience though)
Only from your experience? - be thankful your experiences have been good so far
Whoever you vote for.



The government wins.
Cookie
Posts: 756
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 11:51 am
Location: NE & NW England

Postby Cookie » Mon Oct 24, 2005 5:54 pm

No it is, it literally makes you feel like your on top of the world. I reckon cocaine could increase your chances of passing a job interview like 200%
User avatar
ephiroll
Posts: 1106
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 5:00 am
Location: here and there
Contact:

Postby ephiroll » Mon Oct 24, 2005 8:02 pm

Savanik wrote:
EDIT: Anyone ever die from an overdose of nicotene from cigarettes? ;)


Actually, yeah. Those cigarettes from Japan called "Waves" were implicated in the deaths of more then a dozen people before they were removed from the market about 6 years ago. They were causing lung failure and heart attacks because of the level of nicotine in them.

It's possible to kill someone with a pack of cigarettes, if you know how.


from NICOTINE POISONING by Abu Bakar Abdul Majeed PhD

Nicotine is one of the most lethal poisons known. At present, virtually all toxicities involving nicotine are being reported from cigarettes. More than 90% of toxic exposures from cigarettes in the United States are reported in children less than 5 years of age. A recent report from Germany states that most of the cases are within the 7 month to 2 year old age range. In Nigeria, a herbal drug containing nicotine increases morbidity and mortality in this paediatric group. Ingestion of 1 cigarette (or 3 but ts) or drinking saliva expectorated by tobacco chewer (which is often collected in a can) should be considered potentially toxic for children. In adults, suicidal ingestion of nicotine-containing pesticides, and occasionally after cutaneous exposure to ni cotine, such as tobacco harvesters can cause poisoning. Green tobacco sickness (GTS) is an illness resulting from dermal exposure to dissolved nicotine from wet tobacco leaves. GTS is characterised by nausea, vomitting, weakness, dizziness and sometimes f luctuations in blood pressure or heart rate. Nicorette intoxication is uncommon.
http://www.ephiroll.com
Jeremiah 'Jerry' Donaldson
User avatar
Savanik
Posts: 207
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2005 5:53 am
Location: Missouri, USA

Postby Savanik » Mon Oct 24, 2005 9:51 pm

ephiroll wrote:
from NICOTINE POISONING by Abu Bakar Abdul Majeed PhD

Nicotine is one of the most lethal poisons known. At present, virtually all toxicities involving nicotine are being reported from cigarettes. More than 90% of toxic exposures from cigarettes in the United States are reported in children less than 5 years of age. A recent report from Germany states that most of the cases are within the 7 month to 2 year old age range. In Nigeria, a herbal drug containing nicotine increases morbidity and mortality in this paediatric group. Ingestion of 1 cigarette (or 3 but ts) or drinking saliva expectorated by tobacco chewer (which is often collected in a can) should be considered potentially toxic for children. In adults, suicidal ingestion of nicotine-containing pesticides, and occasionally after cutaneous exposure to ni cotine, such as tobacco harvesters can cause poisoning. Green tobacco sickness (GTS) is an illness resulting from dermal exposure to dissolved nicotine from wet tobacco leaves. GTS is characterised by nausea, vomitting, weakness, dizziness and sometimes f luctuations in blood pressure or heart rate. Nicorette intoxication is uncommon.


So, in other words, if you use cigarettes in a manner in which they weren't intended (by ingesting them), they can be toxic, particularly in small children (who are naturally inclined to stick most anything in their mouths).

Or if you're swallowing a nicotene-based pesticide in an attempt to kill yourself...

Or if you work in someplace that manufacures tobacco and don't follow the safety rules...

Somehow, I still fail to see how cigarettes can be considered worse than HEROIN.

Sav

Return to “Non-Cantr-Related Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest