"Under anarchy, uncoordinated competitive theft by 'roving bandits' destroys the incentive to invest and produce, leaving little for either the population or the bandits. Both can be better off if a bandit sets himself up as a dictator - a 'stationary bandit' who monopolizes and rationalizes theft in the form of taxes." (Mancur Olson, "Dictatorship, democracy, and development", American Political Science Review, 87:3 (1993), p. 567).
A few lines later he quotes a guy in a poor Southern Italian village: "Monarchy is the best kind of government because the King is then owner of the country. Like the owner of a house, when the wiring is wrong, he fixes it." (ibidem)
Cool quotes, no?
Heh, that's only the first paragraph of the article





