Would you vote to reinstate Rconley as a PD member?
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 6:11 am
Below is a copy of what I posted on “Apologies, and Thanks...." I am curious however just how many of us would VOTE given the opportunity to return Rconley to her position on the Players Department
I realize not ever Cantr Player may come from a Democracy, but I believe the most of us do. Those of us that do live in a Democracy however are aware that we have to have someone enforcing the Laws and Making Judgments over cases of breaking the laws. We elect Sheriffs and Judges to do just this. And we elect those to lead us for example in the US, President and Congress. They volunteer for the Position, and we vote for them and the one that gets the majority votes has the job. As the saying goes “For the People and BY the People"
I know each and every person of the Cantr Staff is a volunteer and I for one am VERY thankful for the Volunteers. BUT and IF in this situation there is a GREAT volunteer that has done what many feel has been a Wonderful job volunteering her time to enforce the rules of the Game. To take the pressure of the GAB (which by the way I respect your decision of trying to help lighten their Load) has quit because of another PD Member. COULD we as PLAYERS VOTE as to who WE would rather have on staff enforcing the laws.
I looked up the PD members and saw that it has posted "This is a closed group: no more users accepted " IF there is that many applying that you have to make that statement am I out of line in suggesting that we make the PD Department an Elected position? I believe this would make accepting the PD decision easier for players. AND it would take away some of the POWER HUNGRY attitudes that some PD Members May or May not have. I have no problem with having a Players Department enforcing Rules of the game. IT’S A GOOD THING. I WANT IT. But as a Player if a PD Member such as Rconley is willing to give up the position she volunteered for and did a superb job at fulfilling. JUST because of another Players Department member. I WANT RCONLEY BACK.
VOTE RCONLEY
I realize not ever Cantr Player may come from a Democracy, but I believe the most of us do. Those of us that do live in a Democracy however are aware that we have to have someone enforcing the Laws and Making Judgments over cases of breaking the laws. We elect Sheriffs and Judges to do just this. And we elect those to lead us for example in the US, President and Congress. They volunteer for the Position, and we vote for them and the one that gets the majority votes has the job. As the saying goes “For the People and BY the People"
I know each and every person of the Cantr Staff is a volunteer and I for one am VERY thankful for the Volunteers. BUT and IF in this situation there is a GREAT volunteer that has done what many feel has been a Wonderful job volunteering her time to enforce the rules of the Game. To take the pressure of the GAB (which by the way I respect your decision of trying to help lighten their Load) has quit because of another PD Member. COULD we as PLAYERS VOTE as to who WE would rather have on staff enforcing the laws.
I looked up the PD members and saw that it has posted "This is a closed group: no more users accepted " IF there is that many applying that you have to make that statement am I out of line in suggesting that we make the PD Department an Elected position? I believe this would make accepting the PD decision easier for players. AND it would take away some of the POWER HUNGRY attitudes that some PD Members May or May not have. I have no problem with having a Players Department enforcing Rules of the game. IT’S A GOOD THING. I WANT IT. But as a Player if a PD Member such as Rconley is willing to give up the position she volunteered for and did a superb job at fulfilling. JUST because of another Players Department member. I WANT RCONLEY BACK.
VOTE RCONLEY