Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2004 9:52 pm
But he didn't/wouldn't have gone to Krif.
A forum for discussion about the PBBRPG Cantr II
https://forum.cantr.org:443/
jeslange wrote:*sighs* "Yeah, Maily didn't hurt Maynard's companions, and one left right after he died. She told everyone to let him go.
|west| wrote:But he didn't/wouldn't have gone to Krif.
griogal wrote:Meh wrote:As a player not a staff member I think that Valerie and whoever else wants to come up with excuses to protect lost keys should cut it out.
What happened to Maynard could not have spread back to Krif yet correct?
If it did I think it should be fair for anyone to ask exactly how the information got there.
Edit: So it can be verified by the players dept. Maybe e-mailing the players dept on how the information traveled so the players dpet can state that it is legitimate.
Maynard has been away before and no one else lied about him being dead. I don't think that playing at that it is a lie is fair either.
Does this have anything to do with the sudden execution of Rory, although the sentence by the Council had been years of imprisonment and forced labour?
griogal wrote:rklenseth wrote:ephiroll wrote:Meh wrote:Just to poor salt into the wound.
Maily didn't attack Krif though Rory, the Mac Gregor's did and I am not talking about Rory.
Why would the MacGregors try to go after Maynard when they already had passed up so many chances to get him? That doesn't make any sense, if the MacGregors wanted to kill him then it could have been done ages ago before Maynard started building up his power base again, if he'd been killed before about 550 no one probly would even have paid it any attention, instead Gregor was working with Maynard at that time to bring stability to the region, and Maynard was in a building with Gregor, Vender Ghost, Mailly and someone esle for a few days between 550 and 555 or so...the perfect chance to kill him was passed up if any of those people really had wanted to do it. Instead they send Rory "Incompetant" MacGregor to kill Maynard years later? I highly doubt Gregor would be that stupid, and besides, this is the first time IC or OOC that any meantion of the MacGregors having anything to do with any of this has come to my attention. Plus, Gregor steped down as leader of the Rangers, another big mistake if he was after Maynard because that would've been the best place to arrange an attack or to just come up with a reason to kill him, which wouldn't have been hard for him to do. Not to meantion, that one of Rory's reasons for going after Maynard was because Rory thought that Maynard and Gregor had gotten to close.
It was believed that the MacGregors were playing Maynard from the beginning to get inside and gain some trust from him. That is where Rory and Gregor had a dispute. Rory wanted to take Maynard out but Gregor was being cautious. He wanted to not just cut off the head and leave the body.
Rory then went to the Forest to find out if the Forest would aid him. Yes, there were some that wanted to support this but Maily did not and instead got Rory to build some fortress in the Northern Hills to keep him quiet. Then Rory became involved with the whole Silverfoot thing and it was believed he did this to gain the trust of Krif so he could plan his attack. It was at this time that many of Rory's followers abandoned him.
Rory's attack did not invole the Forest. The Forest even went to great lengths to keep him from attacking as a full frontal attack against Krif would only make Maynard look better and hurt the image of everyone else that supported Rory.
Gregor had other plans with Maynard indeed....
Meh wrote:Food for thought. The ends have one thing in common. Harsh "laws". When the middle is wiped away the old ranger code and nosse sensibilities will be gone.
In the old Krif vs. Djorf competition... It seem like the harshness of Krif will prevail in the end even though neither Krif nor Djorf will survive or be the center of the new order. Wonder which end will claim control? Or if they will continue the puppet goverments of the middle.
Meh wrote:Food for thought. The ends have one thing in common. Harsh "laws". When the middle is wiped away the old ranger code and nosse sensibilities will be gone.
In the old Krif vs. Djorf competition... It seem like the harshness of Krif will prevail in the end even though neither Krif nor Djorf will survive or be the center of the new order. Wonder which end will claim control? Or if they will continue the puppet goverments of the middle.
ephiroll wrote:Maybe, but the best way to hold control over a group of cutthroats is to allow them to do whatever their urges tell them to do, so they were allowed a certain amount of freedom. And actually, I didn't remember Maynard sending James to Seatown to kill anyone, that should have only been a spy mission anyway, because Maynard waited in Drojf hills south for about a year for info to lead the army onward with, but before he retired to the KSF wrote everyone sent to Seatown off as MIA. That's probly why I don't remember James. And Maynard got info at one time that Bloodaxe was killed in an attack in Seatown forest I think it was, and was also wrote off as dead. And the DL was sent into Drojf hills to secure the areas which was where they killed most of their victims, I didn't know the DL killed people in Seatown forest. Corla was one of Craktar's men, and was killed after Maynard shut himself up in the KSF, he was alive just before and managing Drojf, Maynard didn't order his death either.
Ahhh...the fun that can start when you arm a bunch of eager young men...they seem to have been busy little bees. I may be off on some things right around that time also, the last month or so before I went inactive for a few months were hit and miss as it was.