Map?
Moderators: Public Relations Department, Players Department
- thingnumber2
- Posts: 661
- Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:31 am
- Location: TN
- Contact:
I think you can dock without a harbor....if the cantr world is flat, wouldn't we just float off into space? that'd be cool, sailing my little boat through space, and landing it on cantr mars, in like 50 somthing years...and meeting all the cantr martians...and taking their phasers back to cantr with me....
-
west
- Posts: 4649
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 5:23 pm
- Bowser
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2003 8:55 pm
- Location: Washington, D.C.
-
Siphersh
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2004 8:36 pm
- Location: Hungary
I want to hope, that the map is made recursive in all directions -- that is: if you sail off the edge, you appear at the opposite side of the whole map. That would make a really unearthly geometry: not actual bent plane, but something geometrically entirely unreal. I don't think that this would make any programming difficulty. But I think making new lands may be problematic this way.
But that's just something I'd be glad to discover. What other possibilities are there at all? A finite map? I hope that going on a discovery is appreciated by the code. I mean: arriving at the other end of the world may be very awarding. But sailing forever and dying without the possibility of at least telling others that there is nothing there, well... I feel quite uneasy about that idea.
But, if the map is finite, it would be nice to know for sure, that someone is at the edge. Not just sailing, not moving, and thinking that you're moving. Maybe a "Thar be monsters" sign could be seen, or the edge into nothing, or something.
By the way: how can you draw a map when sailing? The sea is monocolor blue, right? How can you know your distance from where you started? Well, I think that may be ok, that there is no way other than having a vague idea of the boat's speed, ang guessing according to time elapsed. Is it that the only way to map the sea? Guessing?
But that's just something I'd be glad to discover. What other possibilities are there at all? A finite map? I hope that going on a discovery is appreciated by the code. I mean: arriving at the other end of the world may be very awarding. But sailing forever and dying without the possibility of at least telling others that there is nothing there, well... I feel quite uneasy about that idea.
But, if the map is finite, it would be nice to know for sure, that someone is at the edge. Not just sailing, not moving, and thinking that you're moving. Maybe a "Thar be monsters" sign could be seen, or the edge into nothing, or something.
By the way: how can you draw a map when sailing? The sea is monocolor blue, right? How can you know your distance from where you started? Well, I think that may be ok, that there is no way other than having a vague idea of the boat's speed, ang guessing according to time elapsed. Is it that the only way to map the sea? Guessing?
- Jos Elkink
- Founder Emeritus
- Posts: 5711
- Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2003 1:17 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ireland
- Contact:
My sailor character has quite nice maps just by measuring distance in sailing time
... Of course, you need to rescale it for different types of ships, but still, it's works quite well
...
I'm not going to tell about what happens at the edges
...
And some ships can only dock in harbours, some can also dock on regular land.
I'm not going to tell about what happens at the edges
And some ships can only dock in harbours, some can also dock on regular land.
- Dust14
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 5:06 pm
- Location: Belgium
-
Siphersh
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2004 8:36 pm
- Location: Hungary
OK, as pointed out by someone in another topic, a CUBE could be a codable solution. Lego bricks are rectangular as well...
That's the only finite edgeless real shape I could imagine. A TORUS would be hard to code, and would made a bent plane, that is: if you go 10meters north, 10m e, 10m s, and then 10m w, you wouldn't arrive where you started.
But the non-real geometry of a finite infinity with a large square repeating itself in all four directions would be nice. That would make it possible to sail around the world. Well, assuming that cantr is not 1% in the middle of the square, surrounded by a sea that takes threethousand years to sail around.
But the non-real geometry of a finite infinity with a large square repeating itself in all four directions would be nice. That would make it possible to sail around the world. Well, assuming that cantr is not 1% in the middle of the square, surrounded by a sea that takes threethousand years to sail around.
-
Siphersh
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2004 8:36 pm
- Location: Hungary
JOs, do _not_ tell us, of course, that's the point of it all, that we don't know it, and so it's easy for our characters not to know it. I kinda feel sorry for you, that you know, and so there is no thrill about it for you.
Oh, and could you please upload the image I sent to programming@cantr.net
Oh, and could you please upload the image I sent to programming@cantr.net
- kroner
- Posts: 1463
- Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2003 4:39 pm
- Location: new jersey...
Siphersh wrote:I want to hope, that the map is made recursive in all directions -- that is: if you sail off the edge, you appear at the opposite side of the whole map. That would make a really unearthly geometry: not actual bent plane, but something geometrically entirely unreal. I don't think that this would make any programming difficulty. But I think making new lands may be problematic this way.
a torus has those properties. (spelled it right this time
DOOM!
-
Siphersh
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2004 8:36 pm
- Location: Hungary
Kroner, no. I thought exactly the same, when I read the torus in the other topic. But no, that's not it. Just imagine this: you walk half the perimeter in the inner perimeter, then walk to the outer perimeter, take a half perimeter backwards, and than back to the inner perimeter. All turns 90 degrees. Now, you're closer to where you started, than you were if the map were flat (any shape), with looping at the edges.
So, that's not the same. The recursive finite round-araoun square is not like the torus. It is Eukledian (sp?), not bent. A plane plane. (sorry, I've never talked math in english before) If you slice up a torus, you will not be able to lay it out flat. Cilinder, yes. Torus, no. Sphere, no. Cube, yes.
There is no finite 3d shape in our 3d geometry, that has the surface geometric properties of the square with left-out-right-in and top-bottom the same. That's why this kind of map would depict a world of the shape of a --- well, not real shape. A virtual shape. That sounds veeery exciting to me.
So, that's not the same. The recursive finite round-araoun square is not like the torus. It is Eukledian (sp?), not bent. A plane plane. (sorry, I've never talked math in english before) If you slice up a torus, you will not be able to lay it out flat. Cilinder, yes. Torus, no. Sphere, no. Cube, yes.
There is no finite 3d shape in our 3d geometry, that has the surface geometric properties of the square with left-out-right-in and top-bottom the same. That's why this kind of map would depict a world of the shape of a --- well, not real shape. A virtual shape. That sounds veeery exciting to me.
- kroner
- Posts: 1463
- Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2003 4:39 pm
- Location: new jersey...
-
Revanael
- Posts: 1555
- Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2004 7:15 pm
- boomhaeur
- Posts: 392
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2003 10:11 pm
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Contact:
-
Beseiged
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 4:37 am
- Location: The Pit Of Despair
Return to “General Discussion”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


