1776!
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 4:14 pm
It's Cantr day 1776! Someone needs to have a revolution. 
Cantr II Discussion Forum
A forum for discussion about the PBBRPG Cantr II
https://forum.cantr.org:443/
1776!
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:32 pm
Well, let's hope this whole Cantr-day-to-Earth-years correspondence doesn't get too far... Or rather, hope vehicle-crashing won't be implemented before day 2001...
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 11:48 pm
I would be slightly more concerned about the onset of 1914...
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 11:58 pm
I'd watch my neck for 1789.
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 12:12 am
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 5:45 am
The Surly Cantrian wrote:I would be slightly more concerned about the onset of 1914...
Why? The only person I can imagine saying something would be a random newspawn
A man in his twenties says: "HEY guyz lol
lets go 2 war w/ china lol...... wait does china exist yet? and was it japan or china that was at war in 1914? lol hahahaahah 
we can have our own war w/ who eva lololol!! "
Mulof South- Alex Nysty ring a bell when I speak like that lol?
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 6:42 am
if we only had guillotines 
they could be a machine and you;d have to add a person to it by dragging them. (kind of like a locked room) however they could still communicate with everyone outside of it. then maybe execution could be like a 2 day project in which only 1 person could work it.
also, it should take twice the ammount of dragging power to put someone on the guillotine because they'd probably resist that much more (and to make executions this quick take some cooperation and some work)
they could be a machine and you;d have to add a person to it by dragging them. (kind of like a locked room) however they could still communicate with everyone outside of it. then maybe execution could be like a 2 day project in which only 1 person could work it.
also, it should take twice the ammount of dragging power to put someone on the guillotine because they'd probably resist that much more (and to make executions this quick take some cooperation and some work)
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 7:43 am
Like exicuting prisoners isn't already easy enough... give me auto-hit-backs and then exocusion machines would make for some fun times... especially if guillotines had to be made oustide so everyone can watch.
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 8:19 am
Zanthos wrote:if we only had guillotines
they could be a machine and you;d have to add a person to it by dragging them. (kind of like a locked room) however they could still communicate with everyone outside of it. then maybe execution could be like a 2 day project in which only 1 person could work it.
also, it should take twice the ammount of dragging power to put someone on the guillotine because they'd probably resist that much more (and to make executions this quick take some cooperation and some work)
And the fear in the character of knowing he's gunna die.
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 10:46 am
oh yeah, and it should increase dirtyness of the executioner by 10%
the project should also not be able to paused. it should be either active or canceled.I mean, having the guillotine blade paused halfway through the downward strike is weird, albeit very very cruel.
Imagine the executioner leaving when the project is at like 95%
the project should also not be able to paused. it should be either active or canceled.I mean, having the guillotine blade paused halfway through the downward strike is weird, albeit very very cruel.
Imagine the executioner leaving when the project is at like 95%
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 11:55 am
Zanthos wrote:oh yeah, and it should increase dirtyness of the executioner by 10%
the project should also not be able to paused. it should be either active or canceled.I mean, having the guillotine blade paused halfway through the downward strike is weird, albeit very very cruel.
Imagine the executioner leaving when the project is at like 95%
Heh, snorted when I read the middle paragraph.
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 11:58 am
2001, 1914.. you people all aim so high. Personally I'll just look forward to 1812.
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 1:43 am
Maybe they should add planes and skyscrapers by 2001!
I've already seen plenty of initiative in Cantr for world trade centers...
I've already seen plenty of initiative in Cantr for world trade centers...
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 4:24 am
Didn't I mention that here? Well, I guess my reference was a little vague, and it was in a zomg-I-should-ignore-this color...Joshuamonkey wrote:Maybe they should add planes and skyscrapers by 2001!
I've already seen plenty of initiative in Cantr for world trade centers...
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 10:00 am
Nothing terrible happened on 1066, did it? or 79?