Bmot wrote:Does that answer your question?
Oh, I get it. It's storageception. My characters have never owned anything larger than a bike, so no wonder I didn't get it.

Moderators: Public Relations Department, Players Department
Bmot wrote:Does that answer your question?
ObsessedWithCats wrote:4606-#.##: You see [person] pet a domesticated hawk that he/she is holding.
Is this new? If I recall correctly the old wording was something like 'You see [person] pet a domesticated hawk held by [person].' which was kinda clunky.
SekoETC wrote:ObsessedWithCats wrote:4606-#.##: You see [person] pet a domesticated hawk that he/she is holding.
Is this new? If I recall correctly the old wording was something like 'You see [person] pet a domesticated hawk held by [person].' which was kinda clunky.
It was changed three days ago.
Marian wrote:I do sort of wish characters could take their already existing dresses and just add lace to them.
Raynus wrote:Adding "lace-decorated dress" was total nonsense IMO. You should focus more on basic items, than more detailed versions of existing ones, Seko.
Raynus wrote:Adding "lace-decorated dress" was total nonsense IMO. You should focus more on basic items, than more detailed versions of existing ones, Seko.
*Wiro wrote:There is very little you can do with obsidian, so feel free to post more suggestions in the appropriate section.
returner wrote:*Wiro wrote:There is very little you can do with obsidian, so feel free to post more suggestions in the appropriate section.
You can make a port-... wait, wrong game.
Mark Twain wrote:Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; Truth isn't.
*Wiro wrote:Hemp poncho, cape coat, silk cape, wool cape, long wool cloak. (Seko implemented this three weeks ago, we forgot to announce it I think.)
Second this! These are so cool! Thank you!computaertist wrote:Thanks for the new clothes
Return to “General Discussion”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest