Auryn wrote:Discussions like this are good. I remember once coming across a review of the game that had very negative remarks. The writer's point was that since the staff members were an active part of the game, and used their power to have certain biases and acts of favoritism due to IG reasons, and that there was little to no accountability. This review was written before I even started playing, so I have no idea what it was even about, but this is a clear example that people do discuss PD interactions with players. Visibility tells both sides of the story as opposed to the singularity of the disgruntled player. It could only make the staff look better than this sort of one-sided story. And if there are issues that need to be addressed, it gives players a way to speak up and defend themselves.
Honestly I've never understood the insistence on 'privacy' because I'm pretty sure a person can't violate their own privacy? If they want to talk about it, let 'em, and at that point any PD members would be just as welcome to share their own side of things like in any other discussion. The situation we have now is really more like censorship, and I'm not sure what it accomplishes besides frustrating and angering the players being targeted and making everyone else assume the worst about the people controlling the information.