First "character crossroads" experiences...

[new.vogue.nightmare]

While you're at it...could you change the implementation of classes, so that ...I don't have to take them?

[Thomas Pickert]

Thomas, could you remove chars named "Jake's mom" "Jake's dad" "Jake's siblings" they are disrupting the gameplay and somehow limiting my time spent on cantr...

We would rather see, that you make them develop their own reasons to end their life.

[Pirog]

It is not considered a capital rule break to avoid having your characters in the same location, right?

[grayjaket]

No. I mean, well, it's good to think of a good reason to seperate them. I generally don't worry abuot it. My chars don't ever really interact, since they are usually so different. [/i]

[Thomas Pickert]

It is not considered a capital rule break to avoid having your characters in the same location, right?

There has been discussion about this, and we consider it the less problematic of two alternatives. Even though it is technically a Capital Rule break, we rather see people separating their characters for the OOC reason, that they are the same player behind them, before they get themselves in trouble for (probably unconscious) CR breaking, because their two characters cooperate.

There are players (yes, Richard, you are one of them ) that are very capable role-players, and we trust them to handle multiple characters on one location. However, there are other players, who we trusted, and who betrayed us, thus this trust is not easily granted any more. It's a little unfortunate, but that's how it is in a game with so many different kinds of players.

We have to pay tribute to reality sometimes.

[Pirog]

Yes, that is good.
I have two characters amongst the Kept, but so far I have made up reasons for one of them to leave as soon as the other one arrives

I mostly keep mine separated because I find it very boring to have two characters on the same location...

[Thomas Pickert]

That's probably a good way to look at it.