Personal relationships

General out-of-character discussion among players of Cantr II.

Moderators: Public Relations Department, Players Department

blackbirdphelps
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 6:32 am

way over 18

Postby blackbirdphelps » Sat Aug 14, 2004 5:42 am

sparkle wrote:First, I think it should be more on the parent. They should follow there childs behaviors online and if they see that a game like this is to advanced for their child then they should not let them play. :)


Granted my son is just learning to read, and when I do let him get on the internet. I'm sitting beside him to make sure he stays on Noah's Ark in yahoo games. I didn't have any child safe guards on my computer for that fact and my cousin's daughter (13) got on my computer with my son one day.
You bet your leather boots, I got very upset and set all the child safe guards on my computer when I started seeing where she was going. Her mother got pissed off, tho cause she can't get to her LaBears site anymore. But in truth how many parents have the computer knowledge to set the safe guards or how to check on where a child is going? How many parents know how to set limited access on their computers?

I have 2 characters that have budding relationships. They have kissed but it has always been the other character kissing my characters.
1 has a traveling companion but they are the same sex so there will not be a budding relationship with the companion.
The rest of my characters are to busy looking for business partners not marriage partners.

If someone is going to do adult rp-ing then they need to make sure the other character is over 18 in rl. I don't think many adults would know or understand what rp-ing is. And adult rp-ing with someone under 18 could possibly cause problems for Cantr.

I happen to enjoy Cantr. It is really hard to find good rp-ing games.
Can anyone name another rp-ing game that has the wide range of possibilities for a single character?
User avatar
Dragonslayer4ever
Posts: 591
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 4:31 am
Location: On the lonely road of lost souls

Postby Dragonslayer4ever » Sat Aug 14, 2004 6:09 am

SekoETC wrote:You know Gahak. He's a total chauvinist. I'd be surprised if anyone could ever fall for him. :roll: He thinks about riches and power more than women, but feels lonely sometimes. Still, a wife would most likely be more than a servant than a loved one for him.
:P


That sorry man will never get a woman. My charry os still kinda mad that he made fun of his name.Dragon Slayer is a good name to name my own son if I have one. :shock:

Can anyone name another rp-ing game that has the wide range of possibilities for a single character?


Hmm.I am still thinking. Ihave played sooo many in my days.

I do beileve in what everyone is saying about their needing to know the age of the other person when having intimate relationships with that players character.
I am the Dragon Slayer. And as long as I have my friends behind me. I will never fall.
User avatar
Pirog
Posts: 2046
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2003 8:36 am
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden

Postby Pirog » Sat Aug 14, 2004 11:48 am

And adult rp-ing with someone under 18 could possibly cause problems for Cantr.


Trust me, with all porn sites and chat rooms with sexual content available for any kid with a connection no organization will care a bit if a minor is RPing a sexual relationship on a game site.

I find it very strange that so many seems to see 13-15 year olds as children who needs to be sheltered from reality. Believe me, most teens in that age do worse things than playing Cantr...and those that doesn't need to start doing worse things before they become socially retarded.
Eat the invisible food, Industrialist...it's delicious!
User avatar
SekoETC
Posts: 15526
Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 11:07 am
Location: Finland
Contact:

Postby SekoETC » Sat Aug 14, 2004 1:39 pm

Yeah.. I was most cyber active in the age of 13 to 15, I think... You don't need much of knowledge only a good imagination. And then it's time to complain why no one wants to cyber anymore. It's because most people who do that are minors and nobody would really wanna do it with a kid that only has experience online. ...But really, having real life sex spoils all the fun, after than you know it ain't so great and stops you from enjoying Net sex too...
Not-so-sad panda
User avatar
Anthony Roberts
Posts: 2578
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2004 11:45 pm
Location: Chatham, Ontario, Canada

Postby Anthony Roberts » Sat Aug 14, 2004 1:54 pm

Cheshierekat wrote:
Anthony Roberts wrote:... 1 has been killed by their love one (Serious! She's a mad woman!)


She's not mad! :shock:
She's just really, really evil. :D

(I am assuming that you are talking about R & R)


Yep, R & R. And she is mad. She had no reason to kill him >.>
-- Anthony Roberts
User avatar
griogal
Posts: 308
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 1:30 pm
Location: The Wilds

Postby griogal » Mon Aug 16, 2004 9:36 pm

TheTheorist wrote:Its all role play at the end of the day. If a 14 year old is pretending to be an adult they should be mature enough to do so...

But bare in mind the average mental age of all adults is 15....!

Out of my chars-

- is a nomad and never settled anywhere long enough to meet anyone.
- is too scared of the world to be close to anyone.
- is too involved with his purpose and good friend to think of anything else.
- is a social outcast
- has recently become rich and isn't bothered at the moment
- is too involved in the clan
- is a bitch, she has an inventory full of gifts and wears none of them.
- is a hopeless romantic trapped in a barbarians body.
- is travelling on roads far too much
- is 22 going on 62
- doesn't know if he's happy being a man.
- is seen as far too stupid by nearly everyone
- is lost in the mountains slowly starving to death
- is too busy looking into the future to think about it
- has been on a boat with someone for a long time and feels for them but doesn't know how to express it (and is making a fool of herself in the process)

:D


Even nomads, wanderers and barbarians can have girls
"America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in between. "
Oscar Wilde (1854 - 1900)

Return to “General Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest