Children

General out-of-character discussion among players of Cantr II.

Moderators: Public Relations Department, Players Department

User avatar
Sparkle
Posts: 2200
Joined: Sun May 23, 2004 2:19 am
Location: Florida
Contact:

Postby Sparkle » Wed Jun 30, 2004 2:46 pm

Dark_Angel_04 wrote:Kroner as was said before, It was permitted for the players to keep a history of events from the "Childs birth" to the time a person Spawned, Completly unknown player handed the history and an already developed character to take off with, If the Child decides to be a thief and run and get killed it will be a loss dealt with and RP'd when the time comes. 20 cantr years of history Mind you. A lot of thought went into the aspect and the questioning of hey do I really want to do this... I answerd myself yes I do. I am tired of Argueing about this, It will go no where. So there are strong oppinions on both sides about this. All I have to say is MY characters who have been introduced to babies, and have babies. will continue to do so until told to kill them by Jos himself. I do not care what the rest of you think anymore and I will no longer stress myself out over such nonsense. I really like Cantr and I love to Role Play, But today because of this whole arguement, I almost walked and killed all of my characters only keeping my staff duties. There will be no more comments about this topic and any other topic like it by me, as it is just a wasted time spent on who is wrong and who is right when in fact in all of our minds we are right. I have said before, I have a life outside the computer and when I let a silly little discussion get to me so much I would rather not even play.


I agree with Dark_Angel and I am leaving this subject alone. Well I'll try to anyway. I think the game is loosing people because of this and so it should be resolved by the people this effects most and that's the creators of this game. Case close.
a day without cantr, is a day spent in bed convulsing and suffering from withdrawl
User avatar
AoM
Posts: 1806
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 12:52 am
Location: Right where I want to be.

Postby AoM » Wed Jul 07, 2004 8:48 pm

I guess I've come into this discussion a little late, but I would like to add my two cents in because I agree as I think everyone here does, that RPing or not RPing babies is a major thing that must ultimately be resolved somehow, hopefully.

I'll start off by telling people where I stand on this issue. Firstly, I greatly respect people who are able to role-play out the birth and raising of a child, especially in community efforts such as in Longinazy or Siom. I put it in the same category as RPing out relationships in Cantr. Love cannot be programmed into the game, but players take it upon themselves to act out relationships between each other that the game does not provide rules for, and it is a successful and accepted thing because all party's involved are sentient players. The "Rub" obviously is that an RP'd baby in Cantr has no (what I like to call) soul.

People who RP babies are indeed roleplaying adoration and care for an artifact not of the programming design. I see no problem in the intention of such role-play, and I think those who do it are brave souls indeed, but you MUST be able to make it work.

I really would like to see it work. Honestly. But right now, with no foreseeable method of giving these children "souls" when they reach the magical age of 20, I have to cast a vote of concerned disapproval. What are the methods of giving the child a personality?:

Role-play the child as a grown-up?
-Impossible, creates an ethereal character, and no one in there right minds should want that.

Give the child's history to a randomly spawned individual?
-Possible... but lacks much sense and is incredibly dangerous, mostly for the people who have gone to such great lengths to give the child it's rich and well RP'd upbringing.

Do you give control of the new character to a player of one of its parents? It could possibly take forever to spawn a new character in the exact same city, or even region.

Maybe you put up an OOC notice (PLEASE READ: Any Newspawn want to be my kid?) I'm afraid that won't go well. You could easily get a bastard noob who takes your 20 cantr years of hard rp labor and flushes it by ignoring every thing you told him/her about the child's upbringing. (Hate to bring up Murphy's Law, but s*&@ happens.) What do you do then? Make an OOC announcment: (KAY, that really wasn't our child, just an insane person... now accepting new child applicants)


...I'm sure you get my point by now. :wink:

If there were a way to program in a successful system whereby, children are "officially" born, then that would immiediately solve this dreadful "you're insane, no you're insane" debate. (ie: they can be physically seen [She seems strong and is in her fourties. She wears a crown of woven roses, a wool dress, and is holding a child in her arms.])

The way I see it... the child should be an object, have a weight (which should get larger as time passes) and should be in the possession of somebody at all times until a certain age (let's say age ten, arbitrarily). (For those who need a RP reason for needing to "carry" a ten year-old child: think of it as the child NEEDS supervision until this age, and therefore is enough of a hassel as to encumber the person watching over it)

After age ten, the child should be roleplayed, by a human player. From a role-playing standpoint, this is the age when identities begin to be formed. A child under twenty should have limitations. It should deal half-damage with all attacks. Shouldn't be able to use shields. It's weight limit should be significantly reduced...yada yada yada.

In othere words: children should have enough limitations so as to turn away power-gamers. Those individuals who are in this game purely to get a saber/crossbow as soon as possible. A person should be able to control one child character at a time, and there should be a separate button on the mainscreen for this.

When you make a new character, you can sign up to play a child in the same way as you choose which language area you want to be in. If there aren't any children at this point, oh well, play normally or keep a character slot open.

I'm not a programming wiz, but I feel like they've made Cantr so well, I'm sure they could tweak it enough to accomodate these ideas.


I'm not sure if this post should go into suggestions. But I was inspired to write it from this topic, so do with it what you will.

Respectfully,
~AoM
Missy
Posts: 2467
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2003 9:12 am
Location: Pennsylvania

Postby Missy » Wed Jul 07, 2004 11:23 pm

there were a way to program in a successful system whereby, children are "officially" born, then that would immiediately solve this dreadful "you're insane, no you're insane" debate.


I couldn't agree more. But it is my understanding that children being programmed will still not happen with-in a small period of time. Time to implement them, or programmers is lacking.
User avatar
jeslange
Posts: 2719
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 2:54 pm

Postby jeslange » Wed Jul 07, 2004 11:37 pm

My friend swears he'll try to join the Prog once his phone line is hooked up in his house.

Return to “General Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest