New extension
Moderators: Public Relations Department, Players Department
- SekoETC
- Posts: 15523
- Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 11:07 am
- Location: Finland
- Contact:
New extension
This would be kinda like the shack exept even smaller, and can only be built as an extension. Anyway, I still think it should take a hammer.
Name: walk-in closet
Raws: wood>2500
Days needed: 2
People: 2
Weight: 150000
As the name might hint, something like this would be ideal for storing clothes, since they don't have a weight (yet) and cannot be put into containers (yet).
And also because shack is such an ugly name.
Name: walk-in closet
Raws: wood>2500
Days needed: 2
People: 2
Weight: 150000
As the name might hint, something like this would be ideal for storing clothes, since they don't have a weight (yet) and cannot be put into containers (yet).
And also because shack is such an ugly name.
Not-so-sad panda
- viktor
- Posts: 938
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2004 8:36 pm
- Location: winnipeg, manitoba, canada
- dryn
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 9:12 am
- Location: New Zealand
- Pie
- Posts: 3256
- Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 3:30 am
- Location: the headquarters of P.I.E.
- Nosajimiki
- Posts: 468
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 5:13 pm
- Location: in front of a computer
- Nakranoth
- Posts: 1054
- Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 4:49 am
- Location: What if I were in a hypothetical situation?
- wichita
- Administrator Emeritus
- Posts: 4427
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 6:46 pm
- Location: Suomessa!
-
- Posts: 1452
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 9:05 pm
- Location: Montana
They would even worse then bikes for removing bodies. At least with shacks, it is actually possible to get enough people inside to drag out a body. I think this is not really needed (the shack I feel already fills this niche), and would be even more abusable then any building that exists now. I would rather see a smaller stone building as a compliment to the shack.
- wichita
- Administrator Emeritus
- Posts: 4427
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 6:46 pm
- Location: Suomessa!
- dryn
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 9:12 am
- Location: New Zealand
- Nosajimiki
- Posts: 468
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 5:13 pm
- Location: in front of a computer
-
- Posts: 1452
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 9:05 pm
- Location: Montana
dryn wrote:Would it be better then if it was bumped to 3 people?
If you make that change, then you are making it even more into a shack.
dryn wrote:you'd have to find one of those old town leader guys that can single handedly drag people Razz
People who can single handedly drag people usually (always?) cannot drag a body single handedly. I have never seen any occurance of a fresh body being dragged by a single person (old bodies weigh so little that anyone can drag them).
- Crosshair
- Posts: 1255
- Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 9:05 pm
- Location: Brighton, UK.
- SekoETC
- Posts: 15523
- Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 11:07 am
- Location: Finland
- Contact:
- Doug R.
- Posts: 14857
- Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 6:56 pm
- Contact:
SekoETC wrote:Do corpses really lose weight in time? I've never heard of such a thing. And where's the sense in dead people being harder to drag than the living?
Yes, corpse decay has been around for some time.
Dragging the living operates on a differenct mechanism than dragging the dead. With the dead, you're just dragging 60kg for a fresh body. But you are right, I never saw the sense in dragging the living being easier than dragging the dead either.
Hamsters is nice. ~Kaylee, Firefly
Return to “Implemented Suggestions”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest